“Wives, be subject to
your own husbands, as to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, as
Christ also is the head of the church.”
– Ephesians 5:22-23
First, for the record: I really
like men. All my life, my closest friends have been men, and I tend to assume most
men are nice people. That’s why I’ve never felt comfortable calling myself a “feminist:”
a certain percentage of women really do seem to believe that all men are
assholes. I’m not one of them.
I start with that disclaimer
because today’s topic is Biblical submission in marriage as defined in
Ephesians 5:22-23. We’ve all heard this verse a million times, while curiously,
Ephesians 5:25 (which commands that a husband is to love his wife as Christ
loved the church) is often forgotten. But there are enough other Bible verses to make a strong Biblical case for women’s subservience
to men, especially for Bible literalists.
The reactionary wing of
Christianity, in cranking back the clock, advocates women’s return to secondary
status as the cure to modern societal woes – especially divorce, which many see
as the biggest woe of all (after The Gays, of course). Marriage and motherhood
are seen as the ultimate destination for all women, and the secret to an enduring
marriage is the wife’s complete submission to the husband.
And I don’t mean “submission” in a kinky, sexy “Fifty Shades of Grey” kind of way. No, I’m talking about a
“Help Meet” – the assertion that in EVERY
Christian marriage, the husband is to have ultimate control and his wife is to cheerfully
defer to him (whether or not it makes logical sense) regarding everything from the household budget to the way she should wear her hair. The only reason we women exist
at all, they say, is to be helpers (or “Help Meets”) to our husbands (Genesis
2:18) and to squeeze out “quiverfuls” of children (Psalm 127:5) who will be warriors in
"God’s army" (yipes).
Now, I realize that any given modern, American marriage, a
couple has the prerogative to choose what sort of relationship they will have.
That some couples agree that the husband will be the firm head of household is
not a problem for me. But what I find alarming are those fundamentalist or
evangelical Christian sects that make this system absolutely mandatory for all
"truly Christian" couples, regardless of their personal dynamic and psychological makeup. And I
find it terrifying that the teaching is seeping from the outer fringes of
Christiandom to “mainstream” preachers, publishers and megachurches.
Author Elizabeth Rice Handford writes in
“Me? Obey Him?” that a woman who won’t
obey her husband is actually rebelling against God. This is true, she says,
even when the husband is an “unbeliever,” and even if he’s ordering her to do
something immoral or dangerous. “The Scriptures say a woman must ignore her
‘feelings’ about the will of God, and do what her husband says,” she writes.
“When her husband speaks, as if God had spoken audibly from Heaven!”
(Explanation point hers.)
Of course, the wife is
not supposed to work outside the home under any circumstances. The husband is
to be the sole provider (which can be a challenge, since many in the Help Meet
movement have huge families). If the husband can’t – or even simply won’t –
support the family, the faithful wife is advised to simply trust God:
“You think you have to go
to work because he won’t get a job? If he gets hungry, he will probably work!
You feel you have to take charge of the finances because he is irresponsible
with money? He may go bankrupt. But that may be exactly what it takes for God
to get his attention and change his character…Ultimately, your security is not
in your husband but in a sovereign God who is not going to fail you,” says Nancy
Leigh DeMoss, in “Lies Women Believe.” (Because clearly, there are no
Christians who are hungry or homeless.) (Oh, wait.)
Debi Pearl and her creepy
husband Michael, of No Greater Joy ministries, are already infamous for
advocating corporal punishment of children as young as 6 months old, and for
the role of their “child training methods” in the deaths of at least three
children (so far). But little kids aren’t the only victims of
the Pearls’ nauseating teachings. Debi’s book, “Created to be his Help Meet,”
is wildly popular among certain Fundamentalist Christian circles. The book has been a bestseller in Christian bookstores for years, and thousands
of women credit it with saving their marriages.
But I am not sure that all
of these marriages were meant to be saved. Is your husband beating the shit out
of you? Well, praise the Lord! “When God puts you in subjection to
a man whom he knows is going to cause you to suffer,” Debi writes, “it is with
the understanding that you are obeying God by enduring the wrongful suffering.”(!!!) (Exclamation points mine.)
And even in a marriage
that’s not overtly abusive, the husband is expected to get what he wants without
concern for the wife. Debi’s admonition to a woman suffering from painful
intercourse? “Don’t talk to me about how uncomfortable or painful (sex) is for you. Do you think your body is special and has special needs? Do
you know who created you, and do you know he is the same God who expects you to
freely give sex to your husband? Stop the excuses!”
So much for marital sex
being a joyful experience of mutual love between two people. So much for a husband and wife, cooperating as a team, to solve a medical or psychological problem so that both can enjoy the intimacy married couples deserve. No. Lay back and think
of England.
You might wonder if a
husband can simply be a tie-breaker in major decisions when an agreement can’t
be reached; that seems reasonable. But the Help Meet is expected to be hypervigilant
about every word she utters, and how she utters it. “Have you ever handed your husband something and
said, ‘Here, you hold this while I get such and such,’ or, ‘Honey, the baby
needs changing – get me a diaper,’ or, ‘I need for you to cut Johnny's meat
while I get the rolls buttered’(?)” asks Maranatha Chapman. “We need to ask,
not tell (command). No one bosses around anyone they look up to and respect.”
Really? Are men so fragile that their sensitive constitutions cannot handle
imperative sentences?
Even with the word “honey” in them?
Maranatha, of
Kindling Publications, has a particularly peculiar past. The bizarre story of
her so-called betrothal to her husband Matthew – and her father’s disturbing, borderline incestuous involvement in preparing his young daughter for marriage – is so icky,
it defies belief. But the Chapmans’ eldest daughter Lauren is following in
mom’s footsteps. “Instead of focusing on what we need and want,” Lauren writes in her
“Wearing His Purity” blog, “we should lift up our eyes from looking at
ourselves and look for ways to serve our sweet husbands.”
Even some comparatively “liberal” evangelicals are jumping on the
submission bandwagon. Saddleback
Church attracts 20,000 worshipers any given Sunday, many of whom have fled from churches they found
legalistic. Pastor Rick Warren’s “The Purpose-Driven Life” is one of the most
popular spiritual books of all time. Rick Warren delivered the invocation at President Barack Obama's inauguration.
But the megachurch’s view of divorce – even in cases of abuse – is
right out of the Dark Ages. Saddleback’s teaching pastor Tom Holladay describes
its stance this way: “I wish there were a third in Scripture
having been involved as a pastor with situations of abuse. There is something
in me that wishes there were.” When asked to define abuse, Holladay
says, “(It is) making a habit of literally beating you – regularly.”
Well, he defines abuse ("literally" beating). But he does not define "regularly."
Above all, the Help Meet movement seems to value peace in
the family, peace at any price, and peace as the responsibility of the wife alone.
“Instead of two people butting heads, you should submit to your husband,” says
“A Sister of Christ,” who creates YouTube videos about Christian family life.
“Submit, and you will have shalom in your home!”
So what happens when a wife
submits, totally and completely, to her husband? Well, in many families, there
WOULD be shalom in the home. But in others, the situation would be abusive on its face.
And for some women, trust that asks no questions will result in a fragile
state of mind that is easily shattered, because one’s identity is entirely
dependent on another. When someone (male or female) has spent their entire adult life acquiescing
to another (male or female), being obsequious to the point of loss of self, they have no emotional reserves to tap into when something goes wrong.
At age 20, Ashley was a college
student, wife and already a mother of three (hoping for more). She regarded herself as a “Help
Meet in Training” and kept a blog about her
experiences with cooking, cleaning, being a mom and – most importantly –
devoting herself to Justin, her husband.
Justin worked long days, often
into the night, to support his family, and even though he often arrived home
too tired to have much to do with her, Ashley often wrote about him with great
adoration:
I was just thinking about my husband and how incredibly
incredible (Justin) is.
I thank the Lord that He blessed me with such a patient and
understanding man.
Hearing about other men makes me appreciate my Sweet Love
all the more because … he is really quite nearly a saint!
My husband buys me flowers once every week or so. He just
wants to do something nice for me and to see me smile.
Anyways, I love him and I think he rocks so I thought I'd
blog about him :)
Then on their fourth wedding anniversary, Justin left his
cell phone out while he took a shower. Ashley happened to glance at it and see
what was unmistakably a sex-text from a friend of the family. In shock, she
confronted Justin, and he admitted a long time affair.
Ashley’s world splintered into a million pieces. She wrote:
“And so after a short confrontation I lost it. I hit him and
I hit him until he fell over. And then I kicked him too until I saw the water
running down the drain was red.
"And then of course I felt awful and insane and
I laid down on the floor and cried for a long time. I don't condone domestic
violence in any situation and I can only be grateful that he didn't retaliate
or call the police.
“I feel so bad for the children. Here I am thinking about
what blessings children are and wanting to bring more into the world. Well, it
turns out the world is a living hell and I feel so sorry that I got them into
this. I've never wanted anything but happiness for them and now I've failed at
that too.”
The Bible "says" a lot of things. It says that children who
disrespect their parents should be stoned to death. It says that rapists must
marry their victims. And it says that women are to be subservient to men.
Do men want this? Do women want this? Does God?
Really?
9 comments:
OMG. As a happily married woman, a partner and a Christian, I am appalled. I don't read the rhightwhinging stuff. Go you! God does not want cringing, codependency, acceptance of abuse, self-denigration or any of the rest of that crap. I lost it with the 'do you think your body is special?' horror: YES, it is special, YES it has special needs, as they all do. YES it deserves sexual tenderness, attention, and pleasure.
Any man who insists his wife submit to him isn't worthy of being submitted to.
You're brave for stepping into the minds and literature of crazy people! I try to avoid it as much as possible. It makes me too angry to comment either respectfully or rationally. Thank goodness for YOU!
O. M. G! This really hit home with me because so many people tried to cram all that crap down my throat...and they are still doing it. The "Me Obey Him", was given to me several years ago by a friend because it was felt that I wasn't submissive enough. They tried to give me the "Help Meet" book but I rejected it. The Pearls are horrifying. Period. I have found that the more you subject yourself, or submit to your husband, the more he takes advantage of you. They lose respect for you and start getting this entitlement type of thinking. It gets to the point that nothing you do is good enough. I have HAD it with the submission stuff. I believe a good marriage begins with loving and respecting ONE ANOTHER. God loves us and does not want our bodies and souls to be mistreated. I could go on and on...because of what I have had to go through because of well-meaning Christians. I am losing respect for them daily as I see them lay heavy burdens on spouses and children. Christ meant for us to be FREE. When he set us free, we were forgiven, freed from the yoke of sin..and I never want to go back to that burden again. Allowing myself to be abused by them is sin. I want to be the PERSON that he meant me to be, not a dog waiting on the front steps until the master comes home.
There are verses about divorce being allowed for abuse, but they need to be read inside the cultural context of when they were written. Jews know about them, why do many Christians not know about them, including some supposed teachers at Saddleback! Sheesh
Exo 21:10 If he takes another woman for himself, he may not withhold from the first her food, her clothing, or her marital rights.
Exo 21:11 If he does not do these three things for her, she may go out without paying anything at all.
See David Instone-Brewer's books on divorce if you want the details on how to read these verses in cultural context.
DON, you are so correct, and the Pearls are IDIOTS, and this is another reason I am glad I still have my beliefs, but have left the "church system". Thanks!
I LIVED THIS!! Not even so much because my husband insisted on it (he was not a Believer but boy did he use it to his advantage) but because this is what I was taught in church by the 'godly' women I looked up to. I devoured any and all teaching I could find on this subject because I SO BADLY wanted a marriage that was pleasing to God. I have read every book by every author mentioned and a few more. The few times that I did start to question this way of thinking I was quickly put in check by those "Titus 2 women" (they called themselves that) in my church. I am ashamed to say that I so believed this I even taught it to other women!! :( Those who know me can testify to the fact that I, too, SNAPPED. However, when I snapped I did not resort to physical violence toward my husband (oh that would have been fun after the way he treated me for all of those years) but in very passive-aggressive ways and in SELF-destructive behavior because I felt that since I had had ENOUGH and was leaving the marriage, God surely hated me.
Thankfully, I am happily married today to a NON abusive, NON controlling man who doesn't believe any of this CRAP! :)
I LIVED THIS!! Not even so much because my husband insisted on it (he was not a Believer but boy did he use it to his advantage) but because this is what I was taught in church by the 'godly' women I looked up to. I devoured any and all teaching I could find on this subject because I SO BADLY wanted a marriage that was pleasing to God. I have read every book by every author mentioned and a few more. The few times that I did start to question this way of thinking I was quickly put in check by those "Titus 2 women" (they called themselves that) in my church. I am ashamed to say that I so believed this I even taught it to other women!! :( Those who know me can testify to the fact that I, too, SNAPPED. However, when I snapped I did not resort to physical violence toward my husband (oh that would have been fun after the way he treated me for all of those years) but in very passive-aggressive ways and in SELF-destructive behavior because I felt that since I had had ENOUGH and was leaving the marriage, God surely hated me.
Thankfully, I am happily married today to a NON abusive, NON controlling man who doesn't believe any of this CRAP! :)
this is not what the bible means by submission to one's husband. this is opposite of what Good intended for his children in their marriages. what these people teach and practice is a perversion of what God was. telling us. as for stoning diobedient kids.....(as a mom of almost 6 kids I reserve the right to comment on that.) just my view as a Christian ministers wife
Post a Comment